
Clarifying user intent
I see the user's Chinese sentence discusses Barça's payments to Negreira, likely quoting Real Madrid's president about the Negreira case, implying it relates to Barça's peak performance. It sounds like they might be sharing news or looking for more information, but there's no explicit question asked. I should clarify their intent: Would they like a summary, context, fact-check, or timeline? I can provide a brief background on the Negreira case, including payment timelines and legal proceedings.Summarizing the Negreira case
In the 2023-2024 timeframe, charges were made, with developments in September 2023 leading to Barcelona being charged with bribery. As of October 2024, the case is still ongoing, with past payments from 2001 to 2018, totaling about 7.3 million euros, while Barcelona claims these were for technical reports. This coincided with Barça’s golden era (2008-2015). I can provide a concise summary or contextual information, and I should check if the user wants a timeline or specific sources.Fact-checking the Negreira case
I might suggest a quick fact-check regarding the payments made from 2001 to 2018, which indeed overlap with Barça's peak performance years in 2005-2011 and 2014-2016. It’s crucial to distinguish correlation from causation. I can create a timeline with key points: first payments in 2001, Pep’s era from 2008 to 2014, and payments ceasing in 2018. The total amounts are around €7 million, and while the case is ongoing, there haven't been sporting sanctions due to the statute of limitations in LaLiga. I should ask what the user needs, like a quick timeline or data points!Offering next steps
I need to ask the user what they’d like to focus on next, using simple bullet points for clarity. I might suggest options like: 1) timeline and trophy comparison, 2) case updates, 3) key controversies and statements, 4) key data and payment details, and 5) potential sanctions from La Liga or UEFA. I should keep it concise and clear, without making legal claims. Also, I’ll note that Negreira was VP of the technical committee from 1994 to 2018, and payments totaled approximately €7.3 million. Barcelona claims these payments were for technical reports, while prosecutors argue they were meant to influence decisions.Providing updates on the case
In October 2023, the judge described the alleged activities as "active bribery." By 2024, developments included plans to put former presidents on trial. I should phrase this carefully: "西班牙检方在2023起诉俱乐部法人实体及多名前高管,调查以‘持续性腐败/贿赂”等罪名展开;截至2024-10未见最终判决." I’ll also mention Barça's peak years, typically recognized as 2008-2015, during which they won six trophies in 2009, the Champions League in 2011, and a treble in 2015. I’ll keep the response concise in Chinese with bullet points and include a question to engage the user.
要点回应:
- 这句话大体属实:公开材料显示,巴萨向时任西裁判技术委员会副主席内格雷拉或其公司付款约在2001–2018年间;而巴萨的竞技巅峰大致在2008–2015(多次欧冠/三冠王),时间确有重合。
- 金额与性质:媒体与检方文件多次提到累计约700多万欧元;巴萨称系购买裁判技术报告与咨询,检方怀疑意在影响裁判判罚。
- 司法进展:自2023年起西班牙检方对俱乐部法人及多名前高管提起诉讼并持续侦办;截至2024-10未见最终判决或定罪结论。西甲层面因追诉时效暂无体育处罚,欧足联曾审查但未作出最终制裁。 
- 关键信息边界:目前仅能确认“时间重合”和“长期付款”两点;并无司法定论证明因果关系。
你想看哪类整理?
- 2001–2018付款与2008–2015战绩的年度对照表 
- 案件时间线与各方最新说法
- 证据要点:发票、合同、报告内容概览
- 可能的法律与体育层面后果梳理
.gif)